Gender Socialization

Julián Martínez Ramos

Mar 24, 2026

Gender Socialization

  • how do we “learn” how to be fememnine/masculine?

  • how do society’s messages about appropriate (gender) behaviors are transmitted?

  • Gender Socialization >> “Processes through which individuals take on gendered qualities and characteristics and acquire a sense of self.” (Warthon, 2005:35)

  • through socialization people learn what their society expects of them as males or females. >> people are held accountable for these behaviors (“appropriate”)

  • Components:

    • Target => individual who encounters the social world through interactions with parents and caretakers (newborn). Experience other people and themselves.

    • Agent => the individuals, groups, and organizations who pass on cultural information (parents).

Gender Socialization

  • How does it work?

    • 3 Major Theories:

      • Social learning (learning theory)

      • Cognitive development (learning and identity theory)

      • Identification theory (psychoanalysis)

Social learning

  • “Gender roles are learned through the reinforcements (positive and negative) children receive for engaging in gender-appropriate and gender-inappropriate behavior” (Mischel, 1970)

  • Differential treatment of female and male children by parents and other socializing agents creates gender differences in behavior.

  • Comes from a wider theory in psychology => Social Learning Theory (Bandura & Walters, 1963)

  • Mechanisms: experience (reinforcements) and (more important!) observation (vicarious)

Social learning

  • No need to be intentional from agents. Parents aren’t usually aware of their gender modeling actions.

  • also not intentional on target side: experience and observation of consequences of behavior nor

  • “boys don’t cry” >>

    • future reactions to same situations
  • gender-typed behavior => different responses depending upon whether the person engaging in the behavior is female or male.

  • can you think other examples of social learning and gender-typed behavior?

Social learning

Criticism to Social Learning Theory:

  • “passive target” or “Lump of clay” perspective => modeled from the outside

  • research suggests that children are more actively involved in their own socialization than social learning theorists acknowledge

Cognitive development

  • How do people understand/perceive/experience their gender?

  • Study of how people internalize gender meanings from the outside world and then use those meanings to construct an identity consistent with them.

  • connection between “membership” to some sex category >> meanings attached to that membership >> guide individual behavior

  • More active role of individuals during gender socialization >> focus on the ways that children actively seek to understand themselves and their worlds

  • “inside out”> from the perspective of the child and his or her thought processes.

Cognitive development

  • Comes from a wider theory in psychology => Piaget’s principles of cognitive development, and others (Kohlberg, 1966; Bem, 1983/1993)

  • Becoming a gendered person is part of a more general psychological process of cognitive maturation.

  • Gender works as other important cognitive skills (most important?)

Cognitive development

  • Mechanism:

    • once individuals are labeled themselves as gendered (e.g.: female or male)
    • and recognize this as stable feature,
    • they are motivated to seek out gender-appropriate behaviors.
    • give greater value to gender-appropriate behaviors, which in turn reinforces positively this mechanism
  • With time (age), individual’s ability to interpret gender cues become more sophisticated and flexible (general cognitive development)

Cognitive development

Criticism to Cognitive Development Approach:

  • Gender only takes place after individuals are labeled

  • Why is it gender and no other person’s characteristic their most important cognitive organizing principle?

Cognitive development

New developments within cognitive approach: Gender Schema Theory

  • Not just a cognitive skill >> part of identities and personalities.

  • Through this process people acquire traits and personalities that are consistent with their understandings of themselves as male or female. >> “gendered personalities”

“it is also a way of looking at reality that produces and reproduces those traits during a lifetime of self-construction” (Bem, 1993: 154)

  • Social world provides “material” to construct gender identities which in turn guide perception and actions.

  • 2 features of gender schemes (in American society):

    1. Gender Polarization: belief that what is acceptable or appropriate for females is not acceptable or appropriate for males (and vice versa) and that anyone who deviates from these standards is unnatural or immoral (“oppposite sex”).

    2. Androcentrism: belief that males and masculinity are superior to females and femininity, and that males and masculinity are the standard or the norm.

  • Individuals not only internalize that males and females are extremely different, but also the belief that maleness and masculinity are more desirable and highly valued.

  • “boys don’t cry”, “girls play with dolls”

  • From Bem’s perspective androcentrism damages both men and women:

“crossing the gender boundary has a more negative cultural meaning for men than it has for women – which means, in turn, that male gender-boundary-crossers are much more culturally stigmatized than female gender-boundary-crossers.” (Bem 1993: 149–50)

Cognitive development

  • Do these Gender Schemes exist?

  • Why do we use them? how?

  • Children (and adults) use gender (cognitive) schemes to make sense of the social world >> organize and process information from the environment.

  • Social Categorization is inherent to cognitive development and it is a feature performed by the individuals >> they are actives in the process of socialization

  • Becoming gendered it’s not only to learn what is expected as male/female >> become “gender schematic”

    • activate gender schemes to organize, interpret and process social information.
  • Social Learning and Cognitive are not exclusive >> social learning theory attends more to the ways that parents and others respond to children, while cognitive theories focus on children efforts to make sense of the world around them.

Identification Theory

  • Concerned explicitly with gender identities and sexuality

  • Disagrees that gender-appropriate behavior is learned through reinforcement or imitation, or reflects an intent to behave in a particular way

  • Comes from a different theory in psychology => Psychoanalysis (Freud)

    • unconscious psychological processes >> gender (some aspects) one of them

Identification Theory

  • Gender identity is formed during early childhood as children develop emotional attachments to a same-sex parent or adult. (Chodorow, 1978)

  • Given extreme dependence for satisfaction of needs, the earliest emotional attachments belong to their mother

  • Infants’ relations with mothers are emotionally significant and deeply meaningful, feelings that may be incorporated into the child’s unconscious

  • Separation of mother >> Development tasks:

    • ego boundaries

    • gender identification

Identification Theory

  • Ego boundaries

    • At the beginning of life there is no distinction between “me” and “not me”

    • This distinction must happen >> ego boundaries

  • Gender Identity

    • Awareness (get sense) of oneself maleness/femaleness

    • Identification with same sex-parent (significant adult)

    • Emotional attachment

Identification Theory

  • Identification is not imitation (voluntary and conscious act)

  • Different for males and females

    • Males develop ego boundaries easily, but gender identity could become problematic because of switching the object of identification (emotionally painful)

    • Females don’t need to switch gender identification but ego boundaries could be difficult (sense of being separate and independent from others)

Identification Theory

  • Result: different gender identities >> differentiated male/female personalities (“relational potential”)

    • Males “will be more comfortable with separation and distance”

    • Females “will feel more comfortable when connected to others and prefer relationship to separation” (“stronger basis for eperiencing other’s needs as own”)

    • Females develop a more secure sense of themselves as women (given their ongoing relations with mothers)

    • Males show a more insecure gender identity (given the switch of identification figure and distant father, “must show masculinity”)

Identification Theory

Criticism:

  • Obscure to verification (unconscious entity)

  • Universalizes a particular kind of mothering and family organization

  • Reinforces exaggerated stereotypes about women and men

  • Understanding how biology, genetics, parenthodd and culture interact to shape personality and behavior, rather than examining each factor separately, is perhaps the best way to proceed as we explore these issues.